[ although these juicy quotes may change in subsequent edits ]
Then,
Antivirus makers responded on Ars - "We're not Scammers"
Unfortunately there was a small matter of 21 apps pulled from the Android market
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2011/03/malware-in-android-market-highlights-googles-vulnerability.ars
So is this simply a matter of Mr DiBona using a pedantic definition of AV?
1. AV has truly morphed to Malware detection
2. If you use Perry's Law of Malware - You can only respond to two kinds of problems - the kind you've seen and the kind you can anticipate. People who care about their data and IT need to address both - and we can't simply trust Google and the Carriers to do it for us.
Perry
Update 1/4/2012 - Maybe he means this?
http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/fake-antivirus-scams-targeting-android-users-122911
Update 1/28/2012
From Slashdot: Android Malware May Have Infected 5 Million Users
Oh really? 5 million users af[in]fected because a platform is
- Totally insecure
- Has no AV or Malware detection
- Even though it has a single place to acquire software, the administrators of the distributor have completely abdicated their responsibilities for quality control
- Largely unpatched due to closed platform on customer dependence on suppliers who prioritize releasing new devices far above fixing the security of old devices?
Hello? Anybody home?